Determining the Degree of Identification Differences of Anatomical Landmarks by Digital Cephalometric Radiography and Conventional Radiographic Technique Using Manual Tracing of Human Skulls

Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Determining the Degree of Identification Differences of Anatomical Landmarks by Digital Cephalometric Radiography and Conventional Radiographic Technique Using Manual Tracing of Human Skulls


Farzin Aslani 1 , *
,
Masoud Feizbakhsh 2
,
Ali Reza Omrani 2
and
Roshanak Ghaffari 2

Authors Information

1 Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan, IR Iran
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Isfahan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan, IR Iran
Article information
  • Biotechnology and Health Sciences: August 01, 2014, 1 (2); e22089
  • Published Online: August 28, 2014
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: March 10, 2014
  • Revised: March 25, 2014
  • Accepted: June 13, 2014
  • DOI: 10.17795/whb.22089

To Cite: Aslani F, Feizbakhsh M, Omrani A R, Ghaffari R. Determining the Degree of Identification Differences of Anatomical Landmarks by Digital Cephalometric Radiography and Conventional Radiographic Technique Using Manual Tracing of Human Skulls, Biotech Health Sci. 2014 ;1(2):e22089. doi: 10.17795/whb.22089.

Abstract
Copyright © 2014, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnote
References
  • 1. McClure SR, Sadowsky PL, Ferreira A, Jacobson A. Reliability of Digital Versus Conventional Cephalometric Radiology: A Comparative Evaluation of Landmark Identification Error. Seminars in Orthodontics. 2005; 11(2): 98-110[DOI]
  • 2. Nair MK, Nair UP. Digital and advanced imaging in endodontics: a review. J Endod. 2007; 33(1): 1-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Wu DM, Wu YN, Guo W, Sameer S. Accuracy of direct digital radiography in the study of the root canal type. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006; 35(4): 263-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Moshfeghi M, Sajadi SS, Sajadi S, Shahbazian M. Conventional versus digital radiography in detecting root canal type in maxillary premolars: an in vitro study. J Dent (Tehran). 2013; 10(1): 74-81[PubMed]
  • 5. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology: Principles and interpretation, 6th edition. St Louis, . Mosby Inc j. 2009; 19(1): 78-80
  • 6. Geelen W, Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E, Kruger M, Hansson LG. Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy, and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique. Eur J Orthod. 1998; 20(3): 331-40[PubMed]
  • 7. Naoumova J, Lindman R. A comparison of manual traced images and corresponding scanned radiographs digitally traced. Eur J Orthod. 2009; 31(3): 247-53[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Jacobsen A, Jacobson RL. Radiographic cephalometry. 2006; : 15-60
  • 9. Turner PJ, Weerakone S. An evaluation of the reproducibility of landmark identification using scanned cephalometric images. J Orthod. 2001; 28(3): 221-9[PubMed]
  • 10. Rueda S, Alcaniz M. An approach for the automatic cephalometric landmark detection using mathematical morphology and active appearance models. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2006; 9: 159-66[PubMed]
  • 11. Roden-Johnson D, English J, Gallerano R. Comparison of hand-traced and computerized cephalograms: landmark identification, measurement, and superimposition accuracy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133(4): 556-64[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Chen YJ, Chen SK, Huang HW, Yao CC, Chang HF. Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004; 33(5): 301-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Chen YJ, Chen SK, Chang HF, Chen KC. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry. Angle Orthod. 2000; 70(5): 387-92[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Schulze RK, Gloede MB, Doll GM. Landmark identification on direct digital versus film-based cephalometric radiographs: a human skull study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 122(6): 635-42[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Tng TT, Chan TC, Hagg U, Cooke MS. Validity of cephalometric landmarks. An experimental study on human skulls. Eur J Orthod. 1994; 16(2): 110-20[PubMed]
  • 16. Yu SH, Nahm DS, Baek SH. Reliability of landmark identification on monitor-displayed lateral cephalometric images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133(6): 790 e1-6[DOI][PubMed]